In the coming decade, it’s estimated that the world’s use of electrical energy will increase by 34% and by 50% by 2030. Investing in smart grids will help to ensure a quality of supply by interconnecting suppliers and consumers via a two-way digital communication network, plus enabling operators to monitor energy usage and cater for changes in demands.
Trying to reduce the energy consumption of houses will help create a more sustainable energy system. However, this will also influence the design of the energy grids in residential areas and seen as energy standards of passive houses are at such a level, it would not be economically viable to invest in more than one energy infrastructure within a residential area. This then indicates that it is vital for passive houses to be embedded into the local energy distribution grids in order to be considered in the design of theses energy grids. If not this could lead to a major drop in energy use of houses which could impact on the feasibility of investing in an energy distribution grid in the future as well as the actual operation of the grid. Furthermore this could also affect energy prices for households.
But, the investment in the grid is only partly dependent on the grid capacity as once in place the grid cost is almost independent of the amount of energy distributed. As a grid is practically a fixed cost, when the energy demands per household decreases, the price per kWh increases because grid related costs do not decrease when the demand decreases. So the concept of passive houses needs to be examined on a broader scale rather than the energy demand for individual houses. Another issue is decreases in energy consumption per household possibly will decreases tax revenues so in order to compensate taxes could be increased.
Is an all-electric (electricity grid) concept best suited for Passive houses??
Well it will not be feasible to invest in two separate energy distribution infrastructures so the grid has to be the obvious choice as they can be combined with off-grid renewable (e.g. wood pellet or solar thermal heating) or on-grid renewable (green power). But the demand peaks for individual households can be much larger than the average demand for residential areas therefore increasing total investment in generation capacity. So, on the basis of things it is not in favour of individual electricity generation and storage systems. Additional instruments to control the grid will be needed e.g. (Smart meters, Electricity Storage, Demand Side Management). Passive houses may have a role to play in this but due to the low energy demands per household, balancing the grid will become more important.
Conclusion
Passive houses may require a more active role to manage and balance grids and because of this they could require extra investments, however, this will need to be done with current crop of houses anyway so it would appear to be a more sustainable option for the future to invest in passive houses. Furthermore, a key point in relation ot the passive houses is the heat storage could provide an instrument that grid operators possibily might utilise in order to manage grid loads across a energy distribution system.